Educational Research in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Challenges of Clinical Education in Midwifery and Strategies to Improve It: A Qualitative Study

Arezoo Shayan ORCID 1 , Faegheh Golalizadeh Bibalan ORCID 2 , * , Mahya Shafaei ORCID 3 , Mona Rahnavardi ORCID 4 and Seyedeh Zahra Masoumi ORCID 5
Authors Information
1 Midwifery Department, Mother and Child Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2 Department of Midwifery, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
3 Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Qazvin University of Medical Science, Qazvin, Iran
4 Midwifery Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Rasht University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
5 Midwifery Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mother and Child Care Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Article information
  • Educational Research in Medical Sciences: June 30, 2019, 8 (1); e88228
  • Published Online: July 23, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 24, 2018
  • Revised: July 17, 2019
  • Accepted: June 22, 2019
  • DOI: 10.5812/erms.88228

To Cite: Shayan A, Golalizadeh Bibalan F, Shafaei M, Rahnavardi M, Masoumi S Z . Challenges of Clinical Education in Midwifery and Strategies to Improve It: A Qualitative Study, Educ Res Med Sci. 2019 ; 8(1):e88228. doi: 10.5812/erms.88228.

Copyright © 2019, Educational Research in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. McCarthy B, Trace A, O'Donovan M, Brady-Nevin C, Murphy M, O'Shea M, et al. Nursing and midwifery students' stress and coping during their undergraduate education programmes: An integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;61:197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.029. [PubMed: 29227889].
  • 2. Lichstein PR. Returning to the bedside: Notes from a clinical educator. N C Med J. 2015;76(3):174-9. doi: 10.18043/ncm.76.3.174. [PubMed: 26510223].
  • 3. Vuso Z, James S. Effects of limited midwifery clinical education and practice standardisation of student preparedness. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;55:134-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.05.014. [PubMed: 28595070].
  • 4. Lendahls L, Oscarsson MG. Midwifery students' experiences of simulation- and skills training. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;50:12-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.005. [PubMed: 28006699].
  • 5. Nottingham S, Henning J. Feedback in clinical education, part II: Approved clinical instructor and student perceptions of and influences on feedback. J Athl Train. 2014;49(1):58-67. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.6.15. [PubMed: 24151809]. [PubMed Central: PMC3917297].
  • 6. d'Souza MS, Karkada SN, Parahoo K, Venkatesaperumal R. Perception of and satisfaction with the clinical learning environment among nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(6):833-40. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.02.005. [PubMed: 25729010].
  • 7. Husebo AML, Storm M, Vaga BB, Rosenberg A, Akerjordet K. Status of knowledge on student-learning environments in nursing homes: A mixed-method systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(7-8):e1344-59. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14299. [PubMed: 29399921].
  • 8. Raofi R, Talaghani F, Hojat M, Shahriari M. A review of the literature: The situation of continuing nursing education in Iran. Nursing. 2009;4(8):59-66.
  • 9. Elo S, Kaariainen M, Kanste O, Polkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngas H. Qualitative content analysis. SAGE Open. 2014;4(1):1-10. doi: 10.1177/2158244014522633.
  • 10. Farzi S, Shahriari M, Farzi S. Exploring the challenges of clinical education in nursing and strategies to improve it: A qualitative study. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7:115. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_169_17. [PubMed: 30271800]. [PubMed Central: PMC6149127].
  • 11. Bayrami R, Ebrahimipour H, Vafaee Najar A. Voices of midwives working in family physician program regarding their challenges and blessings: A qualitative study. J Midwifery Reprod Health. 2018;6(1):1170-8. doi: 10.22038/jmrh.2017.9595.
  • 12. Basaran Acil S, Dinc L. Turkish adaptation and psychometric characteristics of the Nursing Authority and Autonomy Scale. J Nurs Manag. 2018;26(6):735-43. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12611. [PubMed: 29656579].
  • 13. Spence Laschinger HK, Nosko A, Wilk P, Finegan J. Effects of unit empowerment and perceived support for professional nursing practice on unit effectiveness and individual nurse well-being: A time-lagged study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(12):1615-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.04.010. [PubMed: 24810929].
  • 14. Balhara YP, Mathur S. A comparative study of attitudes toward psychiatry among nursing students across successive training years. Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):159-66. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.116246. [PubMed: 24049227]. [PubMed Central: PMC3775048].
  • 15. Harris RC, Rosenberg L, Grace O'Rourke ME. Addressing the challenges of nursing student attrition. J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(1):31-7. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20131218-03. [PubMed: 24328250].
  • 16. Fida R, Laschinger HKS, Leiter MP. The protective role of self-efficacy against workplace incivility and burnout in nursing: A time-lagged study. Health Care Manage Rev. 2018;43(1):21-9. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000126. [PubMed: 27755174].
  • 17. Dinmohammadi MR, Peyrovi H, Mehrdad N. [Undergraduate student nurses’ experiences in clinical environment: Vertical violence]. Iran J Nurs. 2014;27(90):83-93. Persian. doi: 10.29252/ijn.
  • 18. Hajihosseini F, Tafreshi MZ, Hosseini M, Baghestani AR. Postgraduate nursing students' expectations of their supervisors in Iran: A qualitative study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018;23(2):98-104. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_50_17. [PubMed: 29628956]. [PubMed Central: PMC5881238].
  • 19. Boelens R, Voet M, De Wever B. The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors’ views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learning. Comput Educ. 2018;120:197-212. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.009.
  • 20. Reising DL, James B, Morse B. Student perceptions of clinical instructor characteristics affecting clinical experiences. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2018;39(1):4-9. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000241. [PubMed: 29189467].
  • 21. Jasemi M, Whitehead B, Habibzadeh H, Zabihi RE, Rezaie SA. Challenges in the clinical education of the nursing profession in Iran: A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;67:21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.010. [PubMed: 29727826].
  • 22. Arimoto A, Gregg MF, Nagata S, Miki Y, Murashima S. Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs in Japan by faculty members and their educational and research activities. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(5):e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.06.007. [PubMed: 21767896].
  • 23. Jafari Asl M, Chehrzed MM, Shafipour SZ, Ghanbari A. Quality of educational services from viewpoint's of nursing and midwifery students of Guilan University based on servqual model. Res Med Educ. 2014;6(1):50-8. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.rme.6.1.50.
  • 24. Olafsdottir OA, Kristjansdottir H, Halfdansdottir B, Gottfredsdottir H. Midwifery in Iceland: From vocational training to university education. Midwifery. 2018;62:104-6. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.03.021. [PubMed: 29660573].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments