Educational Research in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

The Effect of Different Teaching Methods on the Quality of Tooth Preparation by Preclinical Students

Hedaiat Moradpoor ORCID 1 and Ladan Jamshidy 1 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
Article information
  • Educational Research in Medical Sciences: June 30, 2019, 8 (1); e90960
  • Published Online: July 24, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: February 23, 2019
  • Revised: July 3, 2019
  • Accepted: July 15, 2019
  • DOI: 10.5812/erms.90960

To Cite: Moradpoor H, Jamshidy L. The Effect of Different Teaching Methods on the Quality of Tooth Preparation by Preclinical Students, Educ Res Med Sci. 2019 ; 8(1):e90960. doi: 10.5812/erms.90960.

Copyright © 2019, Educational Research in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. El-Mubarak N, Abu-Bakr N, Omer O, Ibrahim Y. Assessment of undergraduate students’ tooth preparation for full veneer cast restorations. Open J Stomatol. 2014;4(2):43-8. doi: 10.4236/ojst.2014.42008.
  • 2. Al-Moaleem MM, Ahmad M, Porwal A, Elamin EF, Al Shawkani HA, Quadri MFA. Evaluation of tooth preparation by dental students in Jazan University during pre-clinical training. J Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014;13:1166-70.
  • 3. Akbary M, Kargozar S. [Team based learning: An innovative teaching method in preclinic course of restorative dentistry and its impact on the students’ clinical skills, Mashhad dental school]. J Dent Med Tehran Univ Med Sci. 2016;29(2):136-43. Persian.
  • 4. Duta M, Amariei CI, Bogdan CM, Popovici DM, Ionescu N, Nuca CI. An overview of virtual and augmented reality in dental education. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2011;10:42-9.
  • 5. Roy E, Bakr MM, George R. The need for virtual reality simulators in dental education: A review. Saudi Dent J. 2017;29(2):41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.02.001. [PubMed: 28490842]. [PubMed Central: PMC5411891].
  • 6. Khami MR, Keshavarz H, Razeghi S. [Evaluation of last-year dental students' opinions about undergraduate curriculum: Before the revision (2010-11)]. J Dent Med. 2017;30(1):40-7. Persian.
  • 7. Nikzad S, Azari A, Mahgoli H, Akhoundi N. Effect of a procedural video CD and study guide on the practical fixed prosthodontic performance of Iranian dental students. J Dent Educ. 2012;76(3):354-9. [PubMed: 22383605].
  • 8. Jamshidy L, Mozaffari H, Sharifi R, Hamzeh H, Moradpoor H. [Assessing viewpoints of dental students about factors affecting bridge the gap between theoretical education and practical training in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences]. J Educ Strategies Med Sci. 2019;11(6):107-13. Persian. doi: 10.29252/edcbmj.11.06.15.
  • 9. Aragon CE, Zibrowski EM. Does exposure to a procedural video enhance preclinical dental student performance in fixed prosthodontics? J Dent Educ. 2008;72(1):67-71. [PubMed: 18172237].
  • 10. Esser C, Kerschbaum T, Winkelmann V, Krage T, Faber FJ. A comparison of the visual and technical assessment of preparations made by dental students. Eur J Dent Educ. 2006;10(3):157-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2006.00408.x. [PubMed: 16842590].
  • 11. Bottino MA, Valandro LF, Buso L, Ozcan M. The influence of cervical finish line, internal relief, and cement type on the cervical adaptation of metal crowns. Quintessence Int. 2007;38(7):e425-32. [PubMed: 17694207].
  • 12. Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K, Eick JD. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs. J Prosthodont. 2006;15(3):155-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00095.x. [PubMed: 16681497].
  • 13. Poggio CE, Dosoli R, Ercoli C. A retrospective analysis of 102 zirconia single crowns with knife-edge margins. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107(5):316-21. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60083-3. [PubMed: 22546309].
  • 14. Comlekoglu M, Dundar M, Ozcan M, Gungor M, Gokce B, Artunc C. Influence of cervical finish line type on the marginal adaptation of zirconia ceramic crowns. Oper Dent. 2009;34(5):586-92. doi: 10.2341/08-076-L. [PubMed: 19830974].
  • 15. Abdullah LS, Ibraheem AF. The effect of finishing line designs and occlusal surface reduction schemes on vertical marginal fit of full contour CAD/CAM zirconia crown restorations (a comparative in vitro study). Int J Dent Oral Health. 2018;4(1). doi: 10.16966/2378-7090.247.
  • 16. Ghafoor R, Siddiqui AA, Rahman M. Assessment of convergence angle of full-coverage porcelain fused to metal crowns in clinical practice. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23(2):241-6. [PubMed: 22945717].
  • 17. Hmaidouch R, Neumann P, Mueller WD. Influence of preparation form, luting space setting and cement type on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM crown copings. Int J Comput Dent. 2011;14(3):219-26. [PubMed: 22141231].
  • 18. Richter WA, Ueno H. Relationship of crown margin placement to gingival inflammation. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;30(2):156-61. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(73)90050-4. [PubMed: 4577892].
  • 19. Eissmann HF, Radke RA, Noble WH. Physiologic design criteria for fixed dental restorations. Dent Clin North Am. 1971;15(3):543-68. [PubMed: 4932292].
  • 20. Khazaei S, Jamshidy L, Miri SS, Sepahi V. Educational efficacy of computer and internet training course in kermanshah dental school (brief communication). Educ Res Med Sci. 2014;3(2):1-9.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments